We assessed the potential impacts of land-use changes resulting from a change in the current biofuel policy on biodiversity in Europe. We evaluated the possible impact of both arable and woody biofuel crops on changes in distribution of 313 species pertaining to different taxonomic groups. Using species-specific information on habitat suitability as well as land use simulations for three different biofuel policy options, we downscaled available species distribution data from the original resolution of 50 to 1 km. The downscaled maps were then applied to analyse potential changes in habitat size and species composition at different spatial levels. Our results indicate that more species might suffer from habitat losses rather than benefit from a doubled biofuel target, while abolishing the biofuel target would mainly have positive effects. However, the possible impacts vary spatially and depend on the biofuel crop choice, with woody crops being less detrimental than arable crops. Our results give an indication for policy and decision makers of what might happen to biodiversity under a changed biofuel policy in the European Union. The presented approach is considered to be innovative as to date no comparable policy impact assessment has been applied to such a large set of key species at the European scale.

Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe? / Jeannette, Eggers; Katja, Troltzsch; Falcucci, Alessandra; Maiorano, Luigi; Peter H., Verburg; Erik, Framstad; Gerald, Louette; Dirk, Maes; Szabolcs, Nagy; Wim, Ozinga; Ben, Delbaere. - In: GCB BIOENERGY. - ISSN 1757-1693. - STAMPA. - 1:1(2009), pp. 18-34. [10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01002.x]

Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe?

FALCUCCI, Alessandra;MAIORANO, Luigi;
2009

Abstract

We assessed the potential impacts of land-use changes resulting from a change in the current biofuel policy on biodiversity in Europe. We evaluated the possible impact of both arable and woody biofuel crops on changes in distribution of 313 species pertaining to different taxonomic groups. Using species-specific information on habitat suitability as well as land use simulations for three different biofuel policy options, we downscaled available species distribution data from the original resolution of 50 to 1 km. The downscaled maps were then applied to analyse potential changes in habitat size and species composition at different spatial levels. Our results indicate that more species might suffer from habitat losses rather than benefit from a doubled biofuel target, while abolishing the biofuel target would mainly have positive effects. However, the possible impacts vary spatially and depend on the biofuel crop choice, with woody crops being less detrimental than arable crops. Our results give an indication for policy and decision makers of what might happen to biodiversity under a changed biofuel policy in the European Union. The presented approach is considered to be innovative as to date no comparable policy impact assessment has been applied to such a large set of key species at the European scale.
2009
biodiversity, biofuel crop type, biofuel policy, downscaling, Europe, habitat suitability, impact assessment, land-use change
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe? / Jeannette, Eggers; Katja, Troltzsch; Falcucci, Alessandra; Maiorano, Luigi; Peter H., Verburg; Erik, Framstad; Gerald, Louette; Dirk, Maes; Szabolcs, Nagy; Wim, Ozinga; Ben, Delbaere. - In: GCB BIOENERGY. - ISSN 1757-1693. - STAMPA. - 1:1(2009), pp. 18-34. [10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01002.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/358284
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact