A prospective study designed to measure the accuracy of mammography (MRx), ultrasound (US), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and one of the most recently introduced techniques, vacuum biopsy (VB), in the diagnosis of breast cancer is reported. A sample of 146 breast lesions on 135 patients were examined. The design of the study made it possible to compare MRx, US, FNAC and VB directly, because it excluded several confounding variables. Statistical indicators - sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PPV and NPh), false-negative and false positive rates (FN and FP), suspicious plus indeterminate rate and likelihood ratios (LR) - were calculated. Results: The NPV of MRx and US were remarkably high (92.4% and 97.9%, respectively), confirming previous reports. The complete sensitivity of FNAC was 80%, while specificity was 99.1 % and LR of positive tests 88.8. The combined score of FNAC, US and MRx resulted in a good increase in complete sensitivity; (97.1 %), when compared with the results of the single diagnostic tests evaluated separately. The absolute sensitivity of VB was 97.1% and specificity was 100%. In conclusion, considered together, MRx, US and FNAC appear to be reliable diagnostic procedures and, when they are all negative, the possibility of a cancer is extremely low, although it cannot be completely ruled out. The VB test had the highest absolute sensitivity among all the methods compared. Therefore, this technique could be considered conclusive in diagnostically doubtful cases, avoiding open surgical biopsy.

Accuracy rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy / Bonifacino, Adriana; V., Petrocelli; Tiziana, Pisani; S., Giannerini; A., Giovagnoli; A., Vecchione; P. L., Mingazzini; Giovagnoli, Maria Rosaria. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - STAMPA. - 25:3 C(2005), pp. 2465-2470.

Accuracy rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

BONIFACINO, Adriana;GIOVAGNOLI, Maria Rosaria
2005

Abstract

A prospective study designed to measure the accuracy of mammography (MRx), ultrasound (US), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and one of the most recently introduced techniques, vacuum biopsy (VB), in the diagnosis of breast cancer is reported. A sample of 146 breast lesions on 135 patients were examined. The design of the study made it possible to compare MRx, US, FNAC and VB directly, because it excluded several confounding variables. Statistical indicators - sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PPV and NPh), false-negative and false positive rates (FN and FP), suspicious plus indeterminate rate and likelihood ratios (LR) - were calculated. Results: The NPV of MRx and US were remarkably high (92.4% and 97.9%, respectively), confirming previous reports. The complete sensitivity of FNAC was 80%, while specificity was 99.1 % and LR of positive tests 88.8. The combined score of FNAC, US and MRx resulted in a good increase in complete sensitivity; (97.1 %), when compared with the results of the single diagnostic tests evaluated separately. The absolute sensitivity of VB was 97.1% and specificity was 100%. In conclusion, considered together, MRx, US and FNAC appear to be reliable diagnostic procedures and, when they are all negative, the possibility of a cancer is extremely low, although it cannot be completely ruled out. The VB test had the highest absolute sensitivity among all the methods compared. Therefore, this technique could be considered conclusive in diagnostically doubtful cases, avoiding open surgical biopsy.
2005
breast cancer; diagnostic accuracy; fnac; mammotome; ultrasound; ultrasound.; vacuum biopsy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Accuracy rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy / Bonifacino, Adriana; V., Petrocelli; Tiziana, Pisani; S., Giannerini; A., Giovagnoli; A., Vecchione; P. L., Mingazzini; Giovagnoli, Maria Rosaria. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - STAMPA. - 25:3 C(2005), pp. 2465-2470.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/241187
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact