AIM: This prospective randomized study, deals with neurosedation in dental treatment of 200 disabled patients and unable to cooperate, subdivided in 4 groups of 50 male only patients, with age ranging from 28 to 59 (39+/-11), ASA I-III. METHODS: The pharmaceuticals used were Midazolam (group MID) Propofol (group Prop) and Remifentanil. Midazolam and Propofol were used following a bolus-infusion sequence, both separately and in combination among themselves (MIDPROP group), or with an opioid, Remifentanil (MIDPROPREMI group). ECG, heart rate , non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), SaO(2), EtCO(2) during the procedure were monitored. Induction time, duration of the sedation, recovery time and discharge were reported. RESULTS: The statistical analysis demonstrated the superiority of the PROP group for induction time in minute (3.1+/-0.5) in comparison with the MID group (10.6+/-2.1), the MIDPROP group (4.3+/-1.3) and MIDPROPREMI (3.7+/-1.2). The recovery and discharge times have confirmed the superiority of the MIDPROPREMI group in comparison with the other 3 groups. CONCLUSION: This combination proved best at leveraging the synergistic characteristics of each single pharmaceutical and minimizing the collateral effects of each individually.

Neurosedation in dentistry of the disabled patient: the use of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil / Collini, Saul; Pinto, Giovanni; L., Lejeune; DI CARLO, Stefano; S., Meloncelli; G., Barraco; R., Gatto. - In: MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0026-4970. - 55:3(2006), pp. 99-113.

Neurosedation in dentistry of the disabled patient: the use of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil.

COLLINI, Saul;PINTO, Giovanni;DI CARLO, Stefano;
2006

Abstract

AIM: This prospective randomized study, deals with neurosedation in dental treatment of 200 disabled patients and unable to cooperate, subdivided in 4 groups of 50 male only patients, with age ranging from 28 to 59 (39+/-11), ASA I-III. METHODS: The pharmaceuticals used were Midazolam (group MID) Propofol (group Prop) and Remifentanil. Midazolam and Propofol were used following a bolus-infusion sequence, both separately and in combination among themselves (MIDPROP group), or with an opioid, Remifentanil (MIDPROPREMI group). ECG, heart rate , non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), SaO(2), EtCO(2) during the procedure were monitored. Induction time, duration of the sedation, recovery time and discharge were reported. RESULTS: The statistical analysis demonstrated the superiority of the PROP group for induction time in minute (3.1+/-0.5) in comparison with the MID group (10.6+/-2.1), the MIDPROP group (4.3+/-1.3) and MIDPROPREMI (3.7+/-1.2). The recovery and discharge times have confirmed the superiority of the MIDPROPREMI group in comparison with the other 3 groups. CONCLUSION: This combination proved best at leveraging the synergistic characteristics of each single pharmaceutical and minimizing the collateral effects of each individually.
2006
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Neurosedation in dentistry of the disabled patient: the use of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil / Collini, Saul; Pinto, Giovanni; L., Lejeune; DI CARLO, Stefano; S., Meloncelli; G., Barraco; R., Gatto. - In: MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0026-4970. - 55:3(2006), pp. 99-113.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/237677
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact