Background: We evaluated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on major co-morbidities (hypertension, type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) operative risk score in high-risk super-obese patients undergoing two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LBPD-DS). Methods: 41 super-obese high-risk patients (mean BMI 57.3 +/- 6.5 kg/m(2), age 44.6 +/- 9.7 years) were entered into a prospective study (BMI >= 60, or BMI >= 50 with at least two severe co-morbidities, no Prader-Willi syndrome, no conversion, minimum follow-up 12 months). 9 patients had BMI >= 60. 17 patients (41.4%) had OSAS on C-PAP therapy. In 10 patients, at least one intragastric balloon had been positioned and 4 had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, all with unsatisfactory results. At surgery, 41.5% were classified ASA 4 and 58.5% as ASA 3 (mean ASA score 3.4 +/- 0.5). Patients underwent evaluation every 3 months postoperatively and were restaged at 12 months and/or before the second step. Results: 60% of major co-morbidities were cured and 24% improved. Average BMI after 6 and 12 months was 44.5 +/- 8.1 and 40.8 +/- 8.5 respectively (mean follow-up 22.2 +/- 7.1 months). After 12 months, 57.8% of the patients were co-morbidity-free and 31.5% had only one major co-morbid condition. At restaging, 20% of patients were still classified as ASA score 4 (OSAS on C-PAP therapy). 3 patients showed BMI < 30 and were co-morbidity-free 12 months after LSG. Conclusions: LSG represents a safe and effective procedure to achieve marked weight loss as well as significant reduction of major obesity-related co-morbidities. The procedure reduced the operative risk (ASA score) in super-obese patients undergoing two-stage LBPD-DS.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients / Silecchia, Gianfranco; Boru, Eugeniu Cristian; Alessandro, Pecchia; Mario, Rizzello; Casella, Giovanni; Leonetti, Frida; Basso, Nicola. - In: OBESITY SURGERY. - ISSN 0960-8923. - 16:9(2006), pp. 1138-1144. (Intervento presentato al convegno 10th World Congress of the International-Federation-for-the-Surgery-of-Obesity/19th International Symposium on Obesity Surgery/4th International Symposium on Allied Health Sciences tenutosi a Maastricht, NETHERLANDS nel AUG 31-SEP 03, 2005) [10.1381/096089206778392275].

Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients

SILECCHIA, Gianfranco
;
Cristian Boru
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
CASELLA, GIOVANNI;LEONETTI, Frida;BASSO, Nicola
2006

Abstract

Background: We evaluated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on major co-morbidities (hypertension, type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) operative risk score in high-risk super-obese patients undergoing two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LBPD-DS). Methods: 41 super-obese high-risk patients (mean BMI 57.3 +/- 6.5 kg/m(2), age 44.6 +/- 9.7 years) were entered into a prospective study (BMI >= 60, or BMI >= 50 with at least two severe co-morbidities, no Prader-Willi syndrome, no conversion, minimum follow-up 12 months). 9 patients had BMI >= 60. 17 patients (41.4%) had OSAS on C-PAP therapy. In 10 patients, at least one intragastric balloon had been positioned and 4 had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, all with unsatisfactory results. At surgery, 41.5% were classified ASA 4 and 58.5% as ASA 3 (mean ASA score 3.4 +/- 0.5). Patients underwent evaluation every 3 months postoperatively and were restaged at 12 months and/or before the second step. Results: 60% of major co-morbidities were cured and 24% improved. Average BMI after 6 and 12 months was 44.5 +/- 8.1 and 40.8 +/- 8.5 respectively (mean follow-up 22.2 +/- 7.1 months). After 12 months, 57.8% of the patients were co-morbidity-free and 31.5% had only one major co-morbid condition. At restaging, 20% of patients were still classified as ASA score 4 (OSAS on C-PAP therapy). 3 patients showed BMI < 30 and were co-morbidity-free 12 months after LSG. Conclusions: LSG represents a safe and effective procedure to achieve marked weight loss as well as significant reduction of major obesity-related co-morbidities. The procedure reduced the operative risk (ASA score) in super-obese patients undergoing two-stage LBPD-DS.
2006
co-morbidities; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; morbid obesity; staged bariatric surgery
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients / Silecchia, Gianfranco; Boru, Eugeniu Cristian; Alessandro, Pecchia; Mario, Rizzello; Casella, Giovanni; Leonetti, Frida; Basso, Nicola. - In: OBESITY SURGERY. - ISSN 0960-8923. - 16:9(2006), pp. 1138-1144. (Intervento presentato al convegno 10th World Congress of the International-Federation-for-the-Surgery-of-Obesity/19th International Symposium on Obesity Surgery/4th International Symposium on Allied Health Sciences tenutosi a Maastricht, NETHERLANDS nel AUG 31-SEP 03, 2005) [10.1381/096089206778392275].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Silecchia_Effectiveness_2006.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 971.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
971.01 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/234759
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 40
  • Scopus 269
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 250
social impact