In the framework of physical Human-Robot Interaction (pHRI), methodologies and experimental tests are presented for the problem of detecting and reacting to collisions between a robot manipulator and a human being. Using a lightweight robot that was especially designed for interactive and cooperative tasks, we show how reactive control strategies can significantly contribute to ensuring safety to the human during physical interaction. Several collision tests were carried out, illustrating the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach. While a subjective "safety" feeling is experienced by users when being able to naturally stop the robot in autonomous motion, a quantitative analysis of different reaction strategies was lacking. In order to compare these strategies on an objective basis, a mechanical verification platform has been built. The proposed collision detection and reactions methods prove to work very reliably and are effective in reducing contact forces far below any level which is dangerous to humans. Evaluations of impacts between robot and human arm or chest up to a maximum robot velocity of 2.7 m/s are presented. ©2008 IEEE.

Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction / S., Haddadin; A., Albu Schaeffer; DE LUCA, Alessandro; G., Hirzinger. - (2008), pp. 3356-3363. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS tenutosi a Nice nel 22 September 2008 through 26 September 2008) [10.1109/iros.2008.4650764].

Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction

DE LUCA, Alessandro;
2008

Abstract

In the framework of physical Human-Robot Interaction (pHRI), methodologies and experimental tests are presented for the problem of detecting and reacting to collisions between a robot manipulator and a human being. Using a lightweight robot that was especially designed for interactive and cooperative tasks, we show how reactive control strategies can significantly contribute to ensuring safety to the human during physical interaction. Several collision tests were carried out, illustrating the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach. While a subjective "safety" feeling is experienced by users when being able to naturally stop the robot in autonomous motion, a quantitative analysis of different reaction strategies was lacking. In order to compare these strategies on an objective basis, a mechanical verification platform has been built. The proposed collision detection and reactions methods prove to work very reliably and are effective in reducing contact forces far below any level which is dangerous to humans. Evaluations of impacts between robot and human arm or chest up to a maximum robot velocity of 2.7 m/s are presented. ©2008 IEEE.
2008
2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction / S., Haddadin; A., Albu Schaeffer; DE LUCA, Alessandro; G., Hirzinger. - (2008), pp. 3356-3363. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS tenutosi a Nice nel 22 September 2008 through 26 September 2008) [10.1109/iros.2008.4650764].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
VE_2008_11573-205817.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 869.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
869.1 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/205817
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 496
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 367
social impact