Abstract We use the ‘‘flying geese’’ framework to study the change in the geography of comparative advantages in the electronics sector in East Asia, China and the USA. Doubts have been raised about the capacity of the ‘‘flying geese’’ model to interpret the most recent phases of Asian development, in particular as far as progress in the electronics sector is concerned. This paper takes issue against these negative conclusions on both theoretical and empirical grounds. On the theoretical side, the paper takes up the formulation proposed by Kaname Akamatsu, arguing that some of the critical observations raised against the model look to a distorted and simplified version of Akamatsu’s original theory. Analyzing the behavior of the ‘‘revealed comparative advantage index’’ per products and area, it is concluded that the ‘‘flying geese model’’ is compatible with manifold industrial development models, increasing interdependence in an integrated area which crucially also includes the US, and that asymmetries and hierarchical order persist across the countries. # 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Patterns of industrialisation and the Flying-geese model: the case of electronics in East Asia / A., Ginzburg; Simonazzi, Annamaria. - In: JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1049-0078. - STAMPA. - 15:(2005), pp. 1051-1078. [10.1016/j.asieco.2004.11.003]

Patterns of industrialisation and the Flying-geese model: the case of electronics in East Asia

SIMONAZZI, Annamaria
2005

Abstract

Abstract We use the ‘‘flying geese’’ framework to study the change in the geography of comparative advantages in the electronics sector in East Asia, China and the USA. Doubts have been raised about the capacity of the ‘‘flying geese’’ model to interpret the most recent phases of Asian development, in particular as far as progress in the electronics sector is concerned. This paper takes issue against these negative conclusions on both theoretical and empirical grounds. On the theoretical side, the paper takes up the formulation proposed by Kaname Akamatsu, arguing that some of the critical observations raised against the model look to a distorted and simplified version of Akamatsu’s original theory. Analyzing the behavior of the ‘‘revealed comparative advantage index’’ per products and area, it is concluded that the ‘‘flying geese model’’ is compatible with manifold industrial development models, increasing interdependence in an integrated area which crucially also includes the US, and that asymmetries and hierarchical order persist across the countries. # 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2005
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Patterns of industrialisation and the Flying-geese model: the case of electronics in East Asia / A., Ginzburg; Simonazzi, Annamaria. - In: JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1049-0078. - STAMPA. - 15:(2005), pp. 1051-1078. [10.1016/j.asieco.2004.11.003]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/17202
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact