Psychological Control (PC) interferes with autonomy-related processes in adolescence and has a negative impact on adolescents’ development related to internalizing and externalizing problems. Several scholars suggested that PC can be used differently by mothers and fathers. However, these differences are still understudied and mainly grounded on maternal and/or adolescents’ perspectives, leading to potentially incomplete inferences on the effects of PC. The present study extends previous research on PC in two directions. First, we tested the dyadic and cumulative effects of maternal and paternal PC on adolescents’ antisocial behaviors and anxious-depressive symptoms. Secondly, we explored the cross-cultural generalizability of these associations in three countries: Italy, Colombia, and USA. Participants included 376 families with data from three consecutive years (T1, adolescents’ age=13.70). Mothers’ and fathers’ reports of PC and youth’s reports of antisocial and internalizing behaviors were assessed. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) we found that maternal PC predicted adolescents’ reported antisocial behaviors whereas paternal PC predicted lower anxious-depressed symptoms. Comparisons across countries evidenced the cross-cultural invariance of the longitudinal APIM across Italy, Colombia, and USA. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

Maternal and paternal psychological control and adolescents’ negative adjustment: a dyadic longitudinal study in three countries / Basili, Emanuele; Zuffiano', Antonio; Pastorelli, Concetta; Thartori, Eriona; Lunetti, Carolina; Favini, Ainzara; Cirimele, Flavia; Di Giunta, Laura; Gerbino, Maria; Bacchini, Dario; Maria Uribe Tirado, Liliana; Lansford, Jennifer E.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:5(2021). [10.1371/journal.pone.0251437]

Maternal and paternal psychological control and adolescents’ negative adjustment: a dyadic longitudinal study in three countries

Emanuele Basili
;
Antonio Zuffianò;Concetta Pastorelli;Eriona Thartori;Carolina Lunetti;Ainzara Favini;Flavia Cirimele;Laura Di Giunta;Maria Gerbino;Dario Bacchini;Jennifer E. Lansford
2021

Abstract

Psychological Control (PC) interferes with autonomy-related processes in adolescence and has a negative impact on adolescents’ development related to internalizing and externalizing problems. Several scholars suggested that PC can be used differently by mothers and fathers. However, these differences are still understudied and mainly grounded on maternal and/or adolescents’ perspectives, leading to potentially incomplete inferences on the effects of PC. The present study extends previous research on PC in two directions. First, we tested the dyadic and cumulative effects of maternal and paternal PC on adolescents’ antisocial behaviors and anxious-depressive symptoms. Secondly, we explored the cross-cultural generalizability of these associations in three countries: Italy, Colombia, and USA. Participants included 376 families with data from three consecutive years (T1, adolescents’ age=13.70). Mothers’ and fathers’ reports of PC and youth’s reports of antisocial and internalizing behaviors were assessed. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) we found that maternal PC predicted adolescents’ reported antisocial behaviors whereas paternal PC predicted lower anxious-depressed symptoms. Comparisons across countries evidenced the cross-cultural invariance of the longitudinal APIM across Italy, Colombia, and USA. The practical implications of these results are discussed.
2021
psychological control; adolescents; parental dyad; cross-cultural comparison
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Maternal and paternal psychological control and adolescents’ negative adjustment: a dyadic longitudinal study in three countries / Basili, Emanuele; Zuffiano', Antonio; Pastorelli, Concetta; Thartori, Eriona; Lunetti, Carolina; Favini, Ainzara; Cirimele, Flavia; Di Giunta, Laura; Gerbino, Maria; Bacchini, Dario; Maria Uribe Tirado, Liliana; Lansford, Jennifer E.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:5(2021). [10.1371/journal.pone.0251437]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Basili_Psychological-control_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 911.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
911.91 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1543771
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact