INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Metabolic Syndrome (METS) has a high prevalence (26.5%–55.6%) in men with LUTS and erectile dysfunction (ED). Daily tadalafil 5mg intake is currently recognized as an effective pharmacological treatment for male LUTS, alone or in combination with alpha-lithics such as tamsulosin 0,4mg, ensuring a greater LUTS relieve. Aim of this study is to assess if METS could affect the efficacy of combination therapy with daily tadalafil 5mg plus tamsulosin 0,4mg in men with LUTS and ED. METHODS: Across 12 months, fifty consecutive patients aged >40 to 80 years, with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS >7) and mild to severe ED (IIEF-5 <22) were enrolled and treated with the previous combination therapy for 12 weeks. The assessment of patients included age, body mass index (BMI), METS features - waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, clinical laboratory parameters- digital rectal examination, IPSS, OABq, uroflowmetry and postvoid residual (PVR) volume, IIEF-5. METS was defined according to NCEP ATP III. Differences were calculated by unpaired sample t-test at baseline and 12 weeks. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for between-group differences. RESULTS: Among 50 patients enrolled, 31 (62.0%) had METS. Mean age was similar with 65.5 years (9.1) in patients without METS and 67.1 years (7.2) in METS patients, p=0.133. Baseline IPSS, OAB-q and IPSS QoL were significantly higher in patients with METS (p<0.05), while IIEF was higher in patients without METS (p=0.039) at baseline (Table1). After 3 months of combination therapy, IIEF, total IPSS and subscores, OAB-q and Qmax significantly improved in both groups. DeltaIPSS, deltaQMax and deltaIIEF were similar between groups (p>0.05). However, total IPSS, IPSS QoL, IPSS Voiding and IPSS Storage were significantly better at the end of the trial in men without METS. Conversely, 12wks IIEF was similar in patients with or without METS (16.3 vs 17.7 p=0.238) (Table2). CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil plus tamsulosin combi therapy represents an effective LUTS treatment in male, independently from METS. Despite a similar improvement of LUTS (delta), patients without METS obtained a significantly better LUTS relieve. Interestingly, the efficacy in ED was greater in men with METS and, at the end of trial, IEEF-5 scores were similar in the two groups.

CAN METABOLIC SYNDROME AFFECT THE EFFICACY OUTCOMES OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH DAILY TADALAFIL 5MG PLUS TAMSULOSIN 0.4MG IN MEN WITH LUTS AND ED? / Sebastianelli, A; Morselli, S; Spatafora, P; Zaccaro, C; Barzaghi, P; De Nunzio, C; Tubaro, A; Vignozzi, L; Maggi, M; Gravas, S; Chapple, C; Serni, S; Gacci, M. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - 203:(2020), pp. E708-E708. (Intervento presentato al convegno AUA tenutosi a Washington).

CAN METABOLIC SYNDROME AFFECT THE EFFICACY OUTCOMES OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH DAILY TADALAFIL 5MG PLUS TAMSULOSIN 0.4MG IN MEN WITH LUTS AND ED?

Zaccaro, C;De Nunzio, C;Tubaro, A;Vignozzi, L;
2020

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Metabolic Syndrome (METS) has a high prevalence (26.5%–55.6%) in men with LUTS and erectile dysfunction (ED). Daily tadalafil 5mg intake is currently recognized as an effective pharmacological treatment for male LUTS, alone or in combination with alpha-lithics such as tamsulosin 0,4mg, ensuring a greater LUTS relieve. Aim of this study is to assess if METS could affect the efficacy of combination therapy with daily tadalafil 5mg plus tamsulosin 0,4mg in men with LUTS and ED. METHODS: Across 12 months, fifty consecutive patients aged >40 to 80 years, with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS >7) and mild to severe ED (IIEF-5 <22) were enrolled and treated with the previous combination therapy for 12 weeks. The assessment of patients included age, body mass index (BMI), METS features - waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, clinical laboratory parameters- digital rectal examination, IPSS, OABq, uroflowmetry and postvoid residual (PVR) volume, IIEF-5. METS was defined according to NCEP ATP III. Differences were calculated by unpaired sample t-test at baseline and 12 weeks. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for between-group differences. RESULTS: Among 50 patients enrolled, 31 (62.0%) had METS. Mean age was similar with 65.5 years (9.1) in patients without METS and 67.1 years (7.2) in METS patients, p=0.133. Baseline IPSS, OAB-q and IPSS QoL were significantly higher in patients with METS (p<0.05), while IIEF was higher in patients without METS (p=0.039) at baseline (Table1). After 3 months of combination therapy, IIEF, total IPSS and subscores, OAB-q and Qmax significantly improved in both groups. DeltaIPSS, deltaQMax and deltaIIEF were similar between groups (p>0.05). However, total IPSS, IPSS QoL, IPSS Voiding and IPSS Storage were significantly better at the end of the trial in men without METS. Conversely, 12wks IIEF was similar in patients with or without METS (16.3 vs 17.7 p=0.238) (Table2). CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil plus tamsulosin combi therapy represents an effective LUTS treatment in male, independently from METS. Despite a similar improvement of LUTS (delta), patients without METS obtained a significantly better LUTS relieve. Interestingly, the efficacy in ED was greater in men with METS and, at the end of trial, IEEF-5 scores were similar in the two groups.
2020
AUA
LUTS, PDE5I
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
CAN METABOLIC SYNDROME AFFECT THE EFFICACY OUTCOMES OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH DAILY TADALAFIL 5MG PLUS TAMSULOSIN 0.4MG IN MEN WITH LUTS AND ED? / Sebastianelli, A; Morselli, S; Spatafora, P; Zaccaro, C; Barzaghi, P; De Nunzio, C; Tubaro, A; Vignozzi, L; Maggi, M; Gravas, S; Chapple, C; Serni, S; Gacci, M. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - 203:(2020), pp. E708-E708. (Intervento presentato al convegno AUA tenutosi a Washington).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
PDE5.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 116.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
116.54 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1456375
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact