Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate early-, mid-, and long-term outcomes in an unselected population of patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with different commercially available off-the-shelf devices. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database on patients presenting an infrarenal AAA treated between January 2008 and December 2015 in a high-volume Italian tertiary referral Center. Demographic, clinical, and specific morphological features were considered as potentially influencing the outcomes and the type of the implanted device. Outcome measures were procedure-related reintervention, AAA-related, and all-cause mortality rates at 30-day, 12-month, and long-term follow-up. Reinterventions considered for the analysis were AAA rupture, graft infection, type I or III endoleaks, type II endoleaks with sac enlargement > 5 mm, graft stenosis or occlusions, procedures related to renal or visceral ischemia, and reintervention for access vessel injury. Results: Of 498 EVAR procedures performed for elective infrarenal AAA treatment during the entire study period, 479 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 73.5 ± 7.34 years (range 51-91), and 416 (86.84%) were men. The mean maximum AAA diameter was 52.02 ± 8.04 mm (range 39–90.2), a maximum AAA diameter ≥59 mm was recorded in 107 patients (22.33%), and an aortic neck length was <10 mm in 137 (28.60%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 52.97 ± 26.16 months (range 1-120), overall reintervention and death rates were 8.14% and 20.04%, respectively, without AAA-related deaths. At univariate analysis, hypertension was the only demographical variable found to be associated with higher risk of reintervention, P = 0.04 (OR: 2.34; CI 95%: 1.00–5.42). Furthermore, male sex (P = 0.02; OR: 2.62; CI 95%: 1.09–6.27) and chronic renal insufficiency (P = 0.003; OR: 2.08; CI 95%: 1.27–3.42) were associated with higher mortality rates. AAA diameter ≥59 mm was statistically associated with a higher rate of both reintervention and mortality: P < 0.001 (OR: 9.05; CI 95%: 4.52–18.11) and <0.001 (4.00; 2.46–6.49), respectively. Conclusions: Our experience seems to suggest that EVAR could be safely and effectively performed in an unselected patients’ population, with encouraging results up to a ten-year follow-up.

Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment. Long-term results from a single-center experience in an unselected patient population / Sirignano, Pasqualino; Mansour, WASSIM AHMAD; Baldassarre, Virgilio; Porreca, CARLO FILIPPO; Cuozzo, Simone; Miceli, Francesca; Capoccia, Laura; Sbarigia, Enrico; Speziale, Francesco. - In: ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0890-5096. - 67:(2020), pp. 274-282. [10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.012]

Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment. Long-term results from a single-center experience in an unselected patient population

Pasqualino Sirignano
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Wassim Mansour;Virgilio Baldassarre;Carlo Filippo Porreca;Simone Cuozzo;Francesca Miceli;Laura Capoccia;Enrico Sbarigia;Francesco Speziale
2020

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate early-, mid-, and long-term outcomes in an unselected population of patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with different commercially available off-the-shelf devices. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database on patients presenting an infrarenal AAA treated between January 2008 and December 2015 in a high-volume Italian tertiary referral Center. Demographic, clinical, and specific morphological features were considered as potentially influencing the outcomes and the type of the implanted device. Outcome measures were procedure-related reintervention, AAA-related, and all-cause mortality rates at 30-day, 12-month, and long-term follow-up. Reinterventions considered for the analysis were AAA rupture, graft infection, type I or III endoleaks, type II endoleaks with sac enlargement > 5 mm, graft stenosis or occlusions, procedures related to renal or visceral ischemia, and reintervention for access vessel injury. Results: Of 498 EVAR procedures performed for elective infrarenal AAA treatment during the entire study period, 479 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 73.5 ± 7.34 years (range 51-91), and 416 (86.84%) were men. The mean maximum AAA diameter was 52.02 ± 8.04 mm (range 39–90.2), a maximum AAA diameter ≥59 mm was recorded in 107 patients (22.33%), and an aortic neck length was <10 mm in 137 (28.60%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 52.97 ± 26.16 months (range 1-120), overall reintervention and death rates were 8.14% and 20.04%, respectively, without AAA-related deaths. At univariate analysis, hypertension was the only demographical variable found to be associated with higher risk of reintervention, P = 0.04 (OR: 2.34; CI 95%: 1.00–5.42). Furthermore, male sex (P = 0.02; OR: 2.62; CI 95%: 1.09–6.27) and chronic renal insufficiency (P = 0.003; OR: 2.08; CI 95%: 1.27–3.42) were associated with higher mortality rates. AAA diameter ≥59 mm was statistically associated with a higher rate of both reintervention and mortality: P < 0.001 (OR: 9.05; CI 95%: 4.52–18.11) and <0.001 (4.00; 2.46–6.49), respectively. Conclusions: Our experience seems to suggest that EVAR could be safely and effectively performed in an unselected patients’ population, with encouraging results up to a ten-year follow-up.
2020
Aaa; abdominal aortic aneurysms; evar
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment. Long-term results from a single-center experience in an unselected patient population / Sirignano, Pasqualino; Mansour, WASSIM AHMAD; Baldassarre, Virgilio; Porreca, CARLO FILIPPO; Cuozzo, Simone; Miceli, Francesca; Capoccia, Laura; Sbarigia, Enrico; Speziale, Francesco. - In: ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0890-5096. - 67:(2020), pp. 274-282. [10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.012]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sirignano_Infrarenal-abdominal-aortic_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 482.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
482.4 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1438904
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact