In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.

Methodological Comparison of Different Projects / Salvatori, Livia Maria; Marceca, Maurizio; Paglione, Lorenzo; Angelozzi, Aurora; Caminada, Susanna; Errigo, Miriam; Tofani, Marco; Battisti, Alessandra; Barnocchi, Asia; Bodini, Chiara; Riccio, Martina; Maralla, Rita; Gentilini, Valeria; Cacciatore, Francesca; Trusiani, Elio; D’Onofrio, Rosalba; Grifoni, Roberta Cocci; Pierantozzi, Mariano; Petrucci, Enrica; Odoguardi, Ilaria; Marchesani, Graziano Enzo; Sgrò, Corrado; Camaioni, Chiara; Sangiorgi, Daniela; Lucchi, Fabio; Carrera, Marta; Paoletti, Flavio; Greco, Alessandro Dario; Iorio, Silvia. - (2020), pp. 225-260. - GREEN ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY. [10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_16].

Methodological Comparison of Different Projects

Salvatori, Livia Maria;Marceca, Maurizio;Paglione, Lorenzo;Angelozzi, Aurora;Caminada, Susanna;Tofani, Marco;Battisti, Alessandra;Barnocchi, Asia;Trusiani, Elio;Camaioni, Chiara;Lucchi, Fabio;Iorio, Silvia
2020

Abstract

In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.
2020
Urban Health
978-3-030-49445-2
978-3-030-49446-9
networking methods; action research; health equity
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Methodological Comparison of Different Projects / Salvatori, Livia Maria; Marceca, Maurizio; Paglione, Lorenzo; Angelozzi, Aurora; Caminada, Susanna; Errigo, Miriam; Tofani, Marco; Battisti, Alessandra; Barnocchi, Asia; Bodini, Chiara; Riccio, Martina; Maralla, Rita; Gentilini, Valeria; Cacciatore, Francesca; Trusiani, Elio; D’Onofrio, Rosalba; Grifoni, Roberta Cocci; Pierantozzi, Mariano; Petrucci, Enrica; Odoguardi, Ilaria; Marchesani, Graziano Enzo; Sgrò, Corrado; Camaioni, Chiara; Sangiorgi, Daniela; Lucchi, Fabio; Carrera, Marta; Paoletti, Flavio; Greco, Alessandro Dario; Iorio, Silvia. - (2020), pp. 225-260. - GREEN ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY. [10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_16].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Salvatori_Methodological_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 238.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
238.81 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1433176
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact