It is well-known that answering conjunctive queries with inequalities (CQ≠s) over DL-LiteR ontologies is in general undecidable. In this paper we consider the subclass of CQ≠s, called CQ≠,bs, where inequalities involve only distinguished variables or individuals. In particular, we tackle the problem of answering C≠,bs and unions thereof (UC≠,bs s) over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies, where DL-LiteR≠ corresponds to DL-LiteR without the Unique Name Assumption, and with the possibility of asserting inequalities between individuals, as in OWL 2 QL. As a first contribution, we show that answering CQ≠,bs over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies has the same computational complexity as the UCQ case over DL-LiteR, i.e., it is in AC0 in data complexity, in PTIME in TBox complexity, and NP-complete in combined complexity. We then deal with the UCQ≠b case, and prove that answering UCQ=≠b over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies is still in AC0 in data complexity and in PTIME in TBox complexity, but is Π2p-hard in combined complexity.

On queries with inequalities in DL-LiteR≠ / Cima, G.; Croce, Federico; Lenzerini, M.; Poggi, A.; Toccacieli, E.. - 2373:(2019). (Intervento presentato al convegno 32nd International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2019 tenutosi a Oslo; Norway).

On queries with inequalities in DL-LiteR≠

Cima G.
;
CROCE, FEDERICO
;
Lenzerini M.
;
Poggi A.
;
2019

Abstract

It is well-known that answering conjunctive queries with inequalities (CQ≠s) over DL-LiteR ontologies is in general undecidable. In this paper we consider the subclass of CQ≠s, called CQ≠,bs, where inequalities involve only distinguished variables or individuals. In particular, we tackle the problem of answering C≠,bs and unions thereof (UC≠,bs s) over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies, where DL-LiteR≠ corresponds to DL-LiteR without the Unique Name Assumption, and with the possibility of asserting inequalities between individuals, as in OWL 2 QL. As a first contribution, we show that answering CQ≠,bs over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies has the same computational complexity as the UCQ case over DL-LiteR, i.e., it is in AC0 in data complexity, in PTIME in TBox complexity, and NP-complete in combined complexity. We then deal with the UCQ≠b case, and prove that answering UCQ=≠b over DL-LiteR≠ ontologies is still in AC0 in data complexity and in PTIME in TBox complexity, but is Π2p-hard in combined complexity.
2019
32nd International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2019
Ontology; Semantics; Access OBDA
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
On queries with inequalities in DL-LiteR≠ / Cima, G.; Croce, Federico; Lenzerini, M.; Poggi, A.; Toccacieli, E.. - 2373:(2019). (Intervento presentato al convegno 32nd International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2019 tenutosi a Oslo; Norway).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cima_On-queries_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2373/paper-12.pdf
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 550.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
550.14 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1359118
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact