Process mining methods allow analysts to use logs of historical executions of business processes in order to gain knowledge about the actual behavior of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An event log is taken as input by an automated process discovery method and produces a business process model as output that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are described by the event log. In this setting, this paper provides a systematic comparative evaluation of existing implementations of automated process discovery methods with domain experts by using a real-life event log extracted from an international software engineering company and four quality metrics: understandability, correctness, precision, and usefulness. The evaluation results highlight gaps and unexplored trade-offs in the field and allow researchers to improve the lacks in the automated process discovery methods in terms of usability of process discovery techniques in industry.

A User Evaluation of Process Discovery Algorithms in a Software Engineering Company / Agostinelli, Simone; Maggi, Fabrizio Maria; Marrella, Andrea; Milani, Fredrik. - (2019), pp. 142-150. (Intervento presentato al convegno 23rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, EDOC 2019 tenutosi a Paris; France) [10.1109/EDOC.2019.00026].

A User Evaluation of Process Discovery Algorithms in a Software Engineering Company

Agostinelli, Simone
;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria
;
Marrella, Andrea
;
2019

Abstract

Process mining methods allow analysts to use logs of historical executions of business processes in order to gain knowledge about the actual behavior of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An event log is taken as input by an automated process discovery method and produces a business process model as output that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are described by the event log. In this setting, this paper provides a systematic comparative evaluation of existing implementations of automated process discovery methods with domain experts by using a real-life event log extracted from an international software engineering company and four quality metrics: understandability, correctness, precision, and usefulness. The evaluation results highlight gaps and unexplored trade-offs in the field and allow researchers to improve the lacks in the automated process discovery methods in terms of usability of process discovery techniques in industry.
2019
23rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, EDOC 2019
process mining; process discovery; quality metrics
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
A User Evaluation of Process Discovery Algorithms in a Software Engineering Company / Agostinelli, Simone; Maggi, Fabrizio Maria; Marrella, Andrea; Milani, Fredrik. - (2019), pp. 142-150. (Intervento presentato al convegno 23rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, EDOC 2019 tenutosi a Paris; France) [10.1109/EDOC.2019.00026].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Agostinelli_Postprint_A-User-Evaluation_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8944956
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 533.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
533.42 kB Adobe PDF
Agostinelli_A-User-Evaluation_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 461.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
461.23 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1347078
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact