A characteristic shared by most frequent types of primary liver cancer, i.e., hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in adults, and in a lesser extent hepatoblastoma (HB) mainly in children, is their high refractoriness to chemotherapy. This is the result of synergic interactions among complex and diverse mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOC) in which more than 100 genes are involved. Pharmacological treatment, although it can be initially effective, frequently stimulates the expression of MOC genes, which results in the relapse of the tumor, usually with a more aggressive and less chemosensitive phenotype. Identification of the MOC genetic signature accounting for the “resistome” present at each moment of tumor life would prevent the administration of chemotherapeutic regimens without chance of success but still with noxious side effects for the patient. Moreover, a better description of cancer cells strength is required to develop novel strategies based on pharmacological, cellular or gene therapy to overcome liver cancer chemoresistance.

Molecular bases of the poor response of liver cancer to chemotherapy / Marin, Jose J. G.; Briz, Oscar; Herraez, Elisa; Lozano, Elisa; Asensio, Maitane; Di Giacomo, Silvia; Romero, Marta R.; Osorio-Padilla, Luis M.; Santos-Llamas, Ana I.; Serrano, Maria A.; Armengol, Carolina; Efferth, Thomas; Macias, Rocio I. R.. - In: CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 2210-7401. - 42:3(2018), pp. 182-192. [10.1016/j.clinre.2017.12.006]

Molecular bases of the poor response of liver cancer to chemotherapy

Di Giacomo, Silvia;
2018

Abstract

A characteristic shared by most frequent types of primary liver cancer, i.e., hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in adults, and in a lesser extent hepatoblastoma (HB) mainly in children, is their high refractoriness to chemotherapy. This is the result of synergic interactions among complex and diverse mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOC) in which more than 100 genes are involved. Pharmacological treatment, although it can be initially effective, frequently stimulates the expression of MOC genes, which results in the relapse of the tumor, usually with a more aggressive and less chemosensitive phenotype. Identification of the MOC genetic signature accounting for the “resistome” present at each moment of tumor life would prevent the administration of chemotherapeutic regimens without chance of success but still with noxious side effects for the patient. Moreover, a better description of cancer cells strength is required to develop novel strategies based on pharmacological, cellular or gene therapy to overcome liver cancer chemoresistance.
2018
cholangiocarcinoma; hepatoblastoma; hepatocellular carcinoma; multidrug resistance; targeted therapies; hepatology; gastroenterology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Molecular bases of the poor response of liver cancer to chemotherapy / Marin, Jose J. G.; Briz, Oscar; Herraez, Elisa; Lozano, Elisa; Asensio, Maitane; Di Giacomo, Silvia; Romero, Marta R.; Osorio-Padilla, Luis M.; Santos-Llamas, Ana I.; Serrano, Maria A.; Armengol, Carolina; Efferth, Thomas; Macias, Rocio I. R.. - In: CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 2210-7401. - 42:3(2018), pp. 182-192. [10.1016/j.clinre.2017.12.006]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Marin_Molecular_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740118300299?via=ihub
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 595.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
595.15 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1276823
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 24
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 57
social impact