BACKGROUND/AIM: Distal gastrectomy (DG) represents the only curative treatment for most mid-lower gastric cancers (GCs). As of 2017, however, no reconstructive modality to conduct after DG has gained unanimous consensus. Additionally, most authors have investigated Billroth 1 and Roux-en-Y (RY) rather than Billroth 2 (B2) reconstruction. We analyzed B2 and RY gastrojejunostomy to identify the preferable technique and augment the available information on B2 restoration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively selected 132 GC patients who were consecutively submitted to DG at our institution between April 2005 and February 2016. B2 and RY anastomosis were accomplished as methods of reconstruction (respectively 36 and 96 cases). We compared these techniques in terms of clinicopathological, surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to RY gastrojejunostomy, B2 reconstruction was significantly associated with a greater mean number of harvested lymph nodes (26.03 vs. 21.65, p=0.045) but also with a longer hospital stay (22.8 vs. 15.7 days) (p=0.022) and higher readmission rate (28.57% vs. 3.1%, p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, reconstruction method was the most significant independent prognostic factor for hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: In light of our results, we propose that B2 gastrojejunostomy deserves more study in order to better identify the best post-DG anastomosis.

Reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Billroth 2 or Roux-en-Y procedure? / Virgilio, Edoardo; Balducci, Genoveffa; Mercantini, Paolo; Ferri, Mario; Bocchetti, Tommaso; Caterino, Salvatore; Salvi, Pier Federico; Ziparo, Vincenzo; Cavallini, Marco. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - STAMPA. - 37:10(2017), pp. 5595-5602. [10.21873/anticanres.11993]

Reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Billroth 2 or Roux-en-Y procedure?

VIRGILIO, EDOARDO;BALDUCCI, Genoveffa;MERCANTINI, Paolo;FERRI, Mario;BOCCHETTI, Tommaso;CATERINO, Salvatore;SALVI, Pier Federico;ZIPARO, Vincenzo;CAVALLINI, Marco
2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Distal gastrectomy (DG) represents the only curative treatment for most mid-lower gastric cancers (GCs). As of 2017, however, no reconstructive modality to conduct after DG has gained unanimous consensus. Additionally, most authors have investigated Billroth 1 and Roux-en-Y (RY) rather than Billroth 2 (B2) reconstruction. We analyzed B2 and RY gastrojejunostomy to identify the preferable technique and augment the available information on B2 restoration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively selected 132 GC patients who were consecutively submitted to DG at our institution between April 2005 and February 2016. B2 and RY anastomosis were accomplished as methods of reconstruction (respectively 36 and 96 cases). We compared these techniques in terms of clinicopathological, surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to RY gastrojejunostomy, B2 reconstruction was significantly associated with a greater mean number of harvested lymph nodes (26.03 vs. 21.65, p=0.045) but also with a longer hospital stay (22.8 vs. 15.7 days) (p=0.022) and higher readmission rate (28.57% vs. 3.1%, p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, reconstruction method was the most significant independent prognostic factor for hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: In light of our results, we propose that B2 gastrojejunostomy deserves more study in order to better identify the best post-DG anastomosis.
2017
distal gastrectomy; Byllroth 2; Rouz-en-Y; gastrointestinal reconstruction; gastric cancer
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Billroth 2 or Roux-en-Y procedure? / Virgilio, Edoardo; Balducci, Genoveffa; Mercantini, Paolo; Ferri, Mario; Bocchetti, Tommaso; Caterino, Salvatore; Salvi, Pier Federico; Ziparo, Vincenzo; Cavallini, Marco. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - STAMPA. - 37:10(2017), pp. 5595-5602. [10.21873/anticanres.11993]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Virgilio_Reconstruction_2017.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Note: PDF
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.2 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1011926
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact